Dale Cresap's blog

Your culture operates on the premise that more is better. Is this always true? The King in Proverbs asked me to give him the food convenient for him recognizing that too much or too little both resulted in problems, and you see this same principle at work today. The concept of too much also applies to a load you must pick up. You can only lift so much. You may not have to lift all your possessions at one time, but the concept of too much can still be valid because they can be a burden whether you are physically lifting them or not.

Do you have favorite authors and teachers? Nearly everyone does, and that makes you a disciple of them as well as of me. Whether this is a good thing or not depends on the quality of the truth they present. Paul invited his audience to follow him as he followed me. If following them leads you closer to me then all is well, but realize everyone knows in part, even your favorites. You are less likely to be limited by their limitations if you are aware of them. Prove all things, hold fast that which is good. Cast your net upon the waters, and sort it out on the deck.

Have you heard of churches described as liberal or conservative? These are the same terms applied to political ideology and in this case they have approximately the same meanings. You would expect to find liberals in a liberal church and conservatives in a conservative church. Yet I made it clear that my Kingdom was not of this world, and these ideological distinctions are very much of this world. I warned that many would come in my name that I did not send. Have you seen those from opposing viewpoints who both claim my support for their agenda?

Are you familiar with the idea that my word is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart? How do you think this works? Have you ever heard someone with an agenda or a fully developed point of view expound it from the Bible? They can assemble verses that back their position. Yet someone with an opposing point of view can also assemble an argument from different verses to support his position.

How good is your vision? Can you see what is right in front of you? Have you ever observed a scene, and not been aware of some essential part of it until someone else pointed it out to you? Perhaps you have been the one to point things out to others, and it is obvious once you see it, but not until then. And so you have expressions about those who cannot see what is right in front of them. I said to my audiences, he who has ears, let him hear, and he who has eyes, let him see. The Pharisees asked if they were blind also and I answered that they were because they claimed to see.

Do you divide the world into sacred and secular, with secular being the default condition, so that only those places and things that are specifically devoted are sacred? This leaves most of the world unclaimed without a fight. Didn’t I make the whole world? Then shouldn’t the default condition be sacred rather than secular? Perhaps a more useful concept than secular is desecrated. If everything is sacred by default, then only those things that are desecrated, or made non-sacred are not. Desecration, like offense, must need come but woe to them that bring it.

If you live in a highly individualistic society, do you think this is the right way to be? Do you look on community-based societies with amazement and amusement, seeing only the problems inherent in this approach, and only the benefits of your own? But there are advantages to community and problems with individualism. There is a human bias to see your familiar and accustomed way of doing things as right or best, but this is subjective and limited rather than eternal and enduring truth.

I said that if you would deny me before men then I would deny you before my Father in heaven. Have you ever seen teenagers who were embarrassed by their parents in the presence of their peers? You know this is wrong even though it is so commonplace as to be cliché. This is an immature stage of development that should not be desired or admired, but it is real. Do you know that there are stages of development for spiritual maturity just as there are for human growth?

Do you look for stability in your life and strive to get back to a simple state of equilibrium? Do you think this is a realistic goal? Do you ride a bike? Can you maintain your balance on a bicycle that isn’t moving? Yet you can easily maintain your balance on a bicycle that is moving forward. You may consider this an illustration for your life. It wasn’t meant to be static and fixed in one location or condition, but constantly changing and moving forward. Stability is still a meaningful concept, but it is dynamic rather than static stability.

What is the worst insult you can make or receive? Is it that someone is irrational? This is to imply that everything should flow from evidence through reasoning to conclusions in a linear, methodical, rigorous and unemotional process. Is this premise itself up for scrutiny? Is this the way life really works? How much of your life is structured this way, or that of anyone you know? And there is a fine line between reason as outlined above and rationalism in which the process happens in reverse and reasons are invented to justify prior conclusions.